The use of computer-assisted orthopedic surgery for total knee replacement in daily practice: a survey among ESSKA/SGO-SSO members. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 16, 536–543 (2008) doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0518-x
Clinical experience with less invasive surgery techniques in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 16, 544–548 (2008) doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0523-0
Roidis, N., Varitimidis, S., Poultsides, L. et al.
2008
A “biologic technique” for the treatment of a disruption of the extensor mechanism after revision total knee arthroplasty: a case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 16, 661–665 (2008) doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0533-y
Garling, E.H., Wolterbeek, N., Velzeboer, S. et al.
2008
Co-contraction in RA patients with a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis during a step-up task. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 16, 734–740 (2008) doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0537-7
Lipoma arborescens of the glenohumeral joint: a possible cause of osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 16, 794–796 (2008) doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0493-2
Agreements between different methods of gap balance estimation in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 17, 60–64 (2009) doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0648-1
A new tourniquet system that determines pressures in synchrony with systolic blood pressure in knee surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 17, 48–52 (2009) doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0640-9
Does stress shielding occur with the use of long-stem prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17, 179–183 (2009) doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0649-0
Two year follow-up comparing computer assisted versus freehand TKR on joint stability, muscular function and patients satisfaction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17, 228–232 (2009) doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0644-5
Staged bilateral mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty in the same patients: a prospective comparison of a posterior-stabilized prosthesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17, 237–243 (2009) doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0662-3